.NETGURU
Which way to build control?
Messages   Related Types
This message was discovered on ASPFriends.com 'aspngarchitecture' list.


Adam Monsky
-- Moved from [aspngcontrolscs] to [aspngarchitecture] by Tony Stark <Click here to reveal e-mail address> --

I'm sure that I want to create a server control, however, I'm not sure if =
I need a composite control or to inherit and extend and existing control. =
I want to create an enhanced textbox control that always creates a custom =
validator control along with it. The validator would provide various =
validation functionality that our business requires, and would be =
standardized for all instances of the custom textbox control. We'd like =
to simply code the validator once, then have it look at the text's =
properties that it's associated with so it knows which validation logic to =
use. This would allow us to drop many custom textbox controls on a web =
form, and set the various custom textbox properties to drive the validator.=
Ideally, we don't even want to worry about dropping a validator and =
hooking it up. We'd like the custom control to handle this automatically.

If I create a composite control, then basically I'd be wrapping a custom =
server control around a custom textbox and a custom validator. In this =
scenario, most of the properties of the composite control would really =
need to be mapped to the textbox control, such as height, width, color, =
font, text, alignment, etc. Of course, these properties are already =
available on the custom textbox control, but I'd have to map them from the =
composite control to the custom textbox control using property get/set =
statements, right? Is there anyway to make the custom textbox control's =
(which is a child control of the composite control) properties map to the =
composite control's properties without coding them all individually? =
Also, wouldn't I be responsible for creating the design time support in =
the composite control, so that the property sheet (and it's various type =
converters?) is available to the developer within the VS.NET IDE? Again, =
if most of the custom textbox properties could be used, that would be =
ideal.=20

The other approach I see would be to create a custom textbox control that =
inherits from the standard textbox control. I could extend the control =
without too much difficulty to support additional properties for our =
business use. However, how to I cause a custom validator to get created =
for every instance of the custom textbox control? Would I simply create =
the custom validator and add it to the page's controls in the OnInit =
method of the custom textbox control? If so, how would this handle =
postbacks? Actually, does the validator need to handle postbacks? All of =
the logic in the custom validator class would effectively be static and =
the same for any instance of the validator/textbox combination.

Does anyone have any insight as to which way would be better and avoid the =
most pitfalls? I've read articles and reviewed source that shows about =
how to create a custom validator, and ones that show a custom server =
control. However, I've not seen discussions or examples of how to =
integrate the a custom validator and a textbox into a custom server =
control. Any pointers/links/samples that could point me in the right =
direction would be appreciated.

Reply to this message...
 
    
Andy Smith
my first instinct is "Composite Control"...

but I think you'd get away with less coding if you subclass TextBox and =
see if you can add the validator to the Controls collection of the =
TextBox. not sure you'll get flexibility you want from this method tho.

also, you might want to go to GotDotNet.com and find a little tool =
written by MS in the "User Samples" area which helps you create =
subclasses and containing classes. something like "Derive Class Tool".

__
Andy Smith
Keyboard Jockey #3a7-2.78.1

[Original message clipped]

Reply to this message...
 
 
System.Web.UI.MobileControls.TextBox
System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox
System.Windows.Forms.TextBox




ExamGuru IT Solutions - .Net Guru is owned and operated by ExamGuru, Inc., the man behind .Net Guru. If you're in the market for bespoke software or software consultancy, why not get him and his highly trained team to help? - www.examguru.net/ITCertification
Ad


Need Dot Net Interview Questions?
Ask ExamGuru, Inc. for advice and help on Passing .Net Interviews
.Net Projects
Best-of-breed application framework for .NET projects, developed by ExamGuru, Inc. and ExamGuru IT
Free .net Help
Commission ExamGuru, Inc. and his team for your next bespoke software project
FogBUGZ
The only bug tracking system carefully crafted with one goal in mind: helping teams create great software.
Awesome Tools
If you don't know about these, you're missing out... IT Certification Questions
IT Interview Questions
Free Oracle 10g Training
MCSE Boortcamp
Cisco Study Guides
Cheap Study Guides
Exact Questions
Dot Net Interview Questions
Oracle OCP
Cheap Travel
Designer Perfumes - Wholesale Prices
Free Programming Tutorials
 
ExamGuru IT Solutions - .Net Guru is owned and operated by ExamGuru, Inc., the man behind .Net Guru. If you're in the market for bespoke software or software consultancy, why not get him and his highly trained team to help? - www.examguru.net/ITCertification
 Copyright © ExamGuru, Inc. 2001-2006
Contact Us - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - www.dot-net-guru.com - www.examguru.net - www.oraclesource.net - www.itinterviews.net - www.examguru.net/ITCertification